In this article, " Civil War In Syria Raises Questions About When to Intervene " is about how the civil war in Syria is making things much much dangerous for those people who are still live in Syria.
" A lot of people are trying to figure out what could be an effective intervention that wouldn't cause more death an suffering," said the U.S Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in May. I think that the U.s should not get involved with what's going on with Syria , until they do something to harm the U.S. Other wise no because we have a lot that is going on with the U.S already an they don't need anything else harmful to happen.
This Civil War is between the military loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-assad and anit- regime protest fighters. Because of this people was being fled from their homes because it was not safe, such as Turkey, Jordan, an Lebanon.
Syrian Army think that it is a good idea to provide untrained men with multiple weapons, such as AK-47's , rocket launchers and home made bombs.
The homemade Bombs are chemical weapons, that are very dangerous for people around them and also them. But according to regime, these types of weapons would only be used towards invasions.
I think that this Civil War is very dangerous and they should get those who are not involved in this civil war, away from it. Also i think that they should work something out because they are not going to work anything out just by going back an forth fighting, bombing an shooting one another.
Sometimes warring peoples don't work things out. The question is whether a more powerful country (like the US) should step in and try to stop the bloodshed in some way. Do you think the US should do this? Should would try to help innocent people seeking democracy, even if it means we might lose troops and money?
ReplyDeleteAlso, chemical weapons are owned by the government. They are not the "home-made bombs" that the rebels have.
80